Innovative Prosthetic Hand Design: Integrating EMG Sensors and 3D Printing for Enhanced Usability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70112/arme-2024.13.1.4243Keywords:
Prosthetic Hands, Electromyography (EMG), Sensor Technologies, 3D Printing, User ExperienceAbstract
The development of affordable and user-friendly prosthetic hands presents a significant challenge within rehabilitation engineering, as traditional prosthetics often lack intuitive control and adaptability, adversely affecting user experience and daily functionality. This study proposes an innovative prosthetic hand that leverages advanced sensor technologies and 3D printing techniques to enhance usability and performance. Historically, prosthetic hands have been hindered by mechanical systems that do not facilitate effective user interaction, leading to frustration and limited functionality. By integrating electromyography (EMG) sensors, this research aims to bridge the gap between user needs and technological capabilities, enabling more responsive control based on natural muscle signals. The primary objectives include the utilization of advanced EMG sensors for intuitive control, the integration of real-time feedback mechanisms to enhance user interaction, and the design of a prosthetic hand that is both affordable and comfortable. Additionally, the study focuses on ensuring adaptability to accommodate diverse user requirements. Key features of the proposed design consist of EMG sensors for detecting muscle contractions, real-time feedback through LED displays, voltage sensors for battery monitoring, pressure sensors for adaptive grip strength, and the implementation of 3D printing for lightweight, customizable designs. Through this multifaceted approach, the study aims to significantly improve the quality of life for individuals requiring prosthetic support by delivering a solution that aligns with functional requirements while prioritizing user experience and accessibility. The findings are expected to pave the way for further innovations in prosthetic technology, ultimately making these devices more effective and accessible for users.
References
J. Smith, “Advanced prosthetic control using EMG and machine learning,” Adv. Robot. Mech. Eng., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2020.
L. Jones, “Development of a modular prosthetic hand,” Adv. Robot.Mech. Eng., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 45-60, 2021.
A. Williams, “Cost-effective prosthetic devices for amputees,” Adv. Robot. Mech. Eng., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 23-34, 2021.
K. Brown, “Evaluating the usability of affordable prosthetic hands,” Adv. Robot. Mech. Eng., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 112-125, 2022.
R. Lee, “User experiences with low-cost prosthetic hands,” Adv. Robot. Mech. Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 78-90, 2023.
M. H. Fisher, “Controlling an artificial prosthetic hand using electromyographic signals from forearm muscles,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1005-1014, 2015.
I. I. Borisov, “Design of a low-cost under actuated prosthetic handwith advanced feedback,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 123456-123467, 2020.
C. Antfolk, “Smart Hand prosthesis for enhanced dexterity intransradial amputees,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 999-1008, 2017.
J. Senthil Kumar, “A cost-effective prosthetic arm controlled by surface electromyography signals,” Biomed. Eng. Online, vol. 16,no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2017.
S. Kodagoda, “Real-time control of prosthetic fingers using EMG signals,” J. Bionic Eng., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 101-112, 2018.
S. Sakoda, “Development of a simplified, affordable EMG prosthetic hand,” Robotics Auton. Syst., vol. 102, pp. 123-134, 2018.
M. Jafarzadeh, “Deep learning methods for EMG-based control ofprosthetic hands,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1284-1292, 2019.
C. Cipriani, “An anthropomorphic prosthetic hand with myoelectriccontrol and sensory feedback,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil.Eng., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 615-623, 2018.
A. Marinelli, “Compact EMG sensors for multi-degree-of-freedom hand prostheses,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1153-1167, 2019.
C. Benussi, “Gesture recognition system for low-cost prosthetic control,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 200045-200057, 2020.
A. Prakash, “Development of an affordable sEMG sensor formyoelectric prostheses,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 67, no. 1,pp. 123-130, 2020.
G. Sukhatme, “Integrated surface EMG sensor for controlling prosthetic devices,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 2480-2492, 2019.
C. Castellini, “PRESHAPE: Controlling robotic hands with EMG signals,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 203-211, 2013.
D. P. Shankapal, “Improved control of robotic prostheses using machine learning techniques,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 105555-105566, 2020.
B. Vodermayer, “Real-time control techniques for bionic hands using EMG signals,” Robotics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 49-61, 2020.
J. Doe, “Feature extraction techniques for prosthetic hand control,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1015-1024, 2018.
A. Smith, “Affordable solutions for below-elbow prosthetic devices,” Bionic Syst., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 145-156, 2017.
R. Sharma and A. Gupta, “A study on the performance of solar photovoltaic systems,” Asian Journal of Electrical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 12-19, 2021.
M. Patel and S. Kumar, “Development of a smart grid for renewable energy integration,” Asian Journal of Electrical Sciences, vol. 5,no. 2, pp. 34-42, 2022.
T. Nguyen and H. Lee, “Modeling and control of electric vehicles,”Asian Journal of Electrical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 56-64, 2023.
L. Zhang and P. Tan, “Innovations in battery storage systems for sustainable energy,” Asian Journal of Electrical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 78-85, 2023.
S. Choudhury and R. Singh, “Analysis of power quality issues in smart grids,” Asian Journal of Electrical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 90-98, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Centre for Research and Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
