Design and Development Prototype of Indigenous Robotic Radio Pharmaceutical Dispenser

Authors

  • Chithra Biju Menon Department of Mechanical Engineering, K.J. Somaiya College of Engineering, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Irfan Siddavatam Department of Information Technology Engineering, K.J. Somaiya College of Engineering, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Vijay Bhosale Department of Mechanical Engineering, K.J. Somaiya College of Engineering, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51983/arme-2020.9.2.2480

Keywords:

nuclear medicine, dispensing, radioactive exposure, radioactive contamination, automation, syringe

Abstract

Working in the nuclear medicine department leads to a possibility of long term low level radiations exposure. Imaging technologies like positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon computer tomography (SPECT) requires radiopharmaceuticals to be administered into the patients. There is radiation exposure to the staff especially when they dispense the required radioactive medicine doses with their hands into the syringes from the source vial. Also, during the process there is a possibility of spillage of the radioactive pharmaceuticals which could lead to radioactive contamination. This project aims at automating the steps involved in dispensing the unit doses into the respective syringes from the source vial and placing it in a lead shielded container. This will be achieved by developing a robotic application to carry out the activities. This will reduce the time for which the nuclear medicine staffs is exposed to the radioactive syringe. The only time when he will be exposed will be when it is injected into the patients.

References

T. Donmoon, W. Chamroonrat, and M. Tuntawiroon, "Radiation exposure to nuclear medicine staffs during 18F-FDG PET/CT procedures at Ramathibodi hospital," J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 694, no. 1, p. 012061, Mar. 2016.

H. Piwowarska-Bilska, B. Birkenfeld, A. Gwardyś, A. Supińska, M. H. Listewnik, B. Elbl, and K. Cichoń-Bańkowska, "Occupational exposure at the Department of Nuclear Medicine as a work environment: A 19-year follow-up," Pol. J. Radiol., vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 18-21, Apr. 2011.

A. Jha, A. Singh, S. Mithun, S. Shah, A. Agrawal, N. Purandare, B. Shetye, and V. Rangarajan, "Designing of high-volume PET/CT facility with optimal reduction of radiation exposure to the staff: Implementation and optimization in a tertiary health care facility in India," World J. Nucl. Med., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 189-196, Sep. 2015.

Alenezi and K. Soliman, "Trends in radiation protection of positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging," Ann. ICRP, vol. 44, no. 1_suppl, pp. 259-270, 2015.

S. Robert and V. Gerbaudo, "Occupational radiation dosimetry assessment using an automated infusion device for positron-emitting radiotracers," J. Nucl. Med. Technol., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 244-248, 2015.

P. Covens, D. Berus, F. Vanhavere, and V. Caveliers, "The introduction of automated dispensing and injection during PET procedures: a step in the optimisation of extremity doses and whole-body doses of nuclear medicine staff," Radiat. Prot. Dosim., vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 250-258, 2010.

N. Benatar, B. Cronin, and M. O’doherty, "Radiation dose rates from patients undergoing positron emission tomography: implications for technologists and waiting areas," Eur. J. Nucl. Med., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 583-589, Apr. 2000.

T. Biran, J. Weininger, S. Malchi, R. Marciano, and R. Chisin, "Measurements of occupational exposure for a technologist performing 18F FDG PET scans," Health Phys., vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 539-544, Nov. 2004.

V. Chiesa, V. De Sanctis, F. Crippa, M. Schiavini, C. Fraigola, A. Bogni, C. Pascali, D. Decise, R. Marchesini, and E. Bombardieri, "Radiation dose to technicians per nuclear medicine procedure: comparison between technetium-99m, gallium-67, and iodine-131 radiotracers and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose," Eur. J. Nucl. Med., vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1380-1389, Nov. 1997.

B. Guillet, P. Quentin, S. Waultier, M. Bourrelly, P. Pisano, and O. Mundler, "Technologist radiation exposure in routine clinical practice with 18F-FDG PET," J. Nucl. Med. Technol., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 175-179, Sep. 2005.

O. Roberts, O. Fiona, H. Gunawardana, K. Pathmaraj, A. Wallace, T. Mi, S. Berlangieri, G. O’Keefe, C. Rowe, and A. Scott, "Radiation dose to PET technologists and strategies to lower occupational exposure," J. Nucl. Med. Technol., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 44-47, Mar. 2005.

Robinson, J. Young, A. Wallace, and V. Ibbetson, "A study of the personal radiation dose received by nuclear medicine technologists working in a dedicated PET center," Health Phys., vol. 88, no. 2_suppl, pp. S17-21, Feb. 2005.

T. Seierstad, E. Stranden, K. Bjering, M. Evensen, A. Holt, H. M. Michalsen, and O. Wetteland, "Doses to nuclear technicians in a dedicated PET/CT centre utilising 18F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)," Radiat. Prot. Dosim., vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 246-249, Feb. 2007.

P. Tandon, M. Venkatesh, and B. Bhatt, "Extremity dosimetry for radiation workers handling unsealed radionuclides in nuclear medicine departments in India," Health Phys., vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 112-118, Feb. 2007.

B. Zeff and M. Yester, "Patient self‐attenuation and technologist dose in positron emission tomography," Med. Phys., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 861-865, Apr. 2005.

Downloads

Published

07-10-2020

How to Cite

Menon, C. B., Siddavatam, I., & Bhosale, V. (2020). Design and Development Prototype of Indigenous Robotic Radio Pharmaceutical Dispenser. Asian Review of Mechanical Engineering, 9(2), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.51983/arme-2020.9.2.2480